← Back to Site | Projects | COR2601 — 900 N Lakeshore Drive
Project Dossier · High-End Residential · Initiated 2026

900 N LAKESHORE
DRIVE

Chicago, Illinois

Scope Single-unit gut
renovation
Building High-Rise
Area ~2,500 SF
3 bed / 3 bath
Entry Point Pre-GC mobilization

Corepoint engaged
before the clock starts.

Corepoint was brought into this engagement before GC mobilization, before any orders were placed, and before the construction schedule was baselined. That early entry is not incidental, it is the control condition. With Italian and European vendor lead times of 18–20 weeks, procurement sequencing cannot be reactive to the construction schedule. The procurement sequencing must drive it.

The engagement covers full pre-construction through closeout: Phase Zero risk review, FF&E category mapping and vendor coordination, master schedule development, Core PM execution control, and closeout. The engagement is structured around a confidential owner relationship — no identifying information circulated beyond the project team.

The primary coordination challenge is not technical complexity, it is decision timing. HNWI owner decision patterns require engineering the decision window into the schedule before it becomes a production delay. That is the active management task.

Location900 N Lakeshore Drive, Chicago, IL
Project TypeHigh-end residential gut renovation
Building TypeChicago luxury high-rise
Client TypePrivate HNWI owner
ServicesFF&E Coordination · Core PM
Engagement ModelFull lifecycle · Pre-construction through closeout
Engagement EntryPre-GC mobilization · Pre-orders · Pre-schedule baseline
Vendor Lead Times18–20 weeks · Italian & European manufacturers
  • Italian & European Vendor Coordination — cabinetry, fixtures, hardware, and finishes specified from Italian and European manufacturers carry 18–20 week production lead times. At those lead times, procurement sequencing cannot wait for the construction schedule, it must drive it. Corepoint's Milan base provides full working-day overlap with manufacturers, direct-language communication with production teams, and preliminary pricing gathered from source without US dealer margin layered in.
  • Building Board Pre-Approval for Interior Alterations — Chicago luxury high-rise buildings require formal submission to building management before an interior alteration permit can be filed with the city. The approval process covers architectural drawings, contractor insurance and licensing verification, work scope review, and building system protection protocols. This is a hard schedule gate that must be initiated and tracked as the first pre-construction dependency, not treated as an administrative formality.
  • Building Access Hour Constraints — Chicago luxury high-rise building management controls trade access windows, typically restricted to specific weekday hours with elevator reservations required for all material deliveries. These are hard limits that directly compress the effective construction calendar. The master schedule must be built with building access hours as a fixed parameter, not a variable, and sequencing conflicts between trades identified before GC mobilization.
  • Owner Decision Deadline Management — HNWI owners do not operate on construction schedule logic. Decision windows that protect vendor production slots, GC subcontractor mobilization, and permit timelines must be engineered into the engagement structure. Each decision has a deadline derived backwards from the constraint it controls. Surfacing those deadlines clearly, early, and repeatedly — and documenting consequences before the window closes — is the active PM task.
Dossier Status
Full project dossier with deliverable
documentation in preparation.

Deliverable dossier inclusive of initiation package, cost control workbook, weekly control reports, and FF&E coordination documents.